Mensajepor Skuall » 18 Sep 2015, 18:00
Mmm, si, ese era justo el chiste, crei que era obvio. Pero de todas formas tampoco lo dijo nunca, es otra leyenda urbana. Copiado de un post en slashdot:
I'm so sick of hearing that quote. Its exact source seems to have been lost in the mists of time, but the consensus is that either Bill Gates didn't say it, or he said it while describing the requirements for a version of DOS and it was taken out of context.
Bill Gates himself denies ever having said it. Here is an excerpt from a 1996 column in the New York Times Syndicate:
<Bill Gates>
QUESTION: I read in a newspaper that in 1981 you said, ``640K of memory should be enough for anybody.'' What did you mean when you said this?
ANSWER: I've said some stupid things and some wrong things, but not that. No one involved in computers would ever say that a certain amount of memory is enough for all time.
The need for memory increases as computers get more potent and software gets more powerful. In fact, every couple of years the amount of memory address space needed to run whatever software is mainstream at the time just about doubles. This is well-known.
When IBM introduced its PC in 1981, many people attacked Microsoft for its role. These critics said that 8-bit computers, which had 64K of address space, would last forever. They said we were wastefully throwing out great 8-bit programming by moving the world toward 16-bit computers.
We at Microsoft disagreed. We knew that even 16-bit computers, which had 640K of available address space, would be adequate for only four or five years. (The IBM PC had 1 megabyte of logical address space. But 384K of this was assigned to special purposes, leaving 640K of memory available. That's where the now-infamous ``640K barrier'' came from.)
A few years later, Microsoft was a big fan of Intel's 386 microprocessor chip, which gave computers a 32-bit address space.
Modern operating systems can now take advantage of that seemingly vast potential memory. But even 32 bits of address space won't prove adequate as time goes on.
Meanwhile, I keep bumping into that silly quotation attributed to me that says 640K of memory is enough. There's never a citation; the quotation just floats like a rumor, repeated again and again.
</Bill Gates>
242 megas en mi Gentoo 64 bits con el icewm y ya me parece demasiado.